Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on reddit

UN rejects market mechanism

Favours increasing state intervention to realize development goals
Dateline: 15 March 2020

“Existing economic theories are incapable of meeting the needs of the future, and we need an economic transition, away from neoclassical economics and market capitalism,” said the latest Sustainable Development report. In other words, capitalism and free markets are not good enough to guarantee prosperity for the people of the world. According to the UN.

This position is bound to stir up heated debate from all quarters. No one can argue with the fact that democratic market economies and global trade have contributed greatly to increased living standards in recent decades, but it seems that the United Nations is having an attack of affluenza.

Only the relatively well-off can afford to build alternative models, make allowances for externalities, and seek to introduce central planning to ‘improve sustainability’. For the many millions, or billions, who have escaped poverty, those are lofty ideals that take second place to consolidating a position in the middle class.

Democracy doesn’t always do what we hope or expect it to do, like reinforce markets. Sometimes democracy leads to the emergence of manipulative politicians and demagogues who are more interested in votes than economic freedom. Spending other people’s money is a great way for socialists to get re-elected; until you run out of other people’s money!

“Granted there are flaws in unbridled capitalism and excessive greed; but expecting bureaucrats to be more efficient with the allocation of resources to the greater good than the market mechanism is misplaced idealism!” huffed one libertarian. Remember the Soviet experiment?

But the UN’s position is clear: We need a transition away from the current model of zero-sum competition, to save the planet and its people. Remembering that UN debates are dominated by politicians, not business people, it’s likely to be a fierce and protracted fight.

Let’s hope some pragmatism emerges, or it might be a case of good intentions with disastrous consequences. Freedom is precious, and not easily surrendered!

Links to related stories

Warning: Hazardous Thinking at Work

Despite appearances to the contrary, Futureworld cannot and does not predict the future. Our Mindbullets scenarios are fictitious and designed purely to explore possible futures, challenge and stimulate strategic thinking. Use these at your own risk. Any reference to actual people, entities or events is entirely allegorical. Copyright Futureworld International Limited. Reproduction or distribution permitted only with recognition of Copyright and the inclusion of this disclaimer. © Public domain image.

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest

Read another Mindbullet

Loss of 30 billion hectoliters blamed on biodynamic farmers
Dateline: April 2017
Emmanuel Giboulot remains unrepentant. “I do not see how refusing to use harmful pesticides is a bad thing. I refuse to support the profits of corporations when our health is at risk from these toxins.” That was in February 2014, when he was found guilty of refusing to spray pesticides against the spread of leafhopper...

Sign up to receive news from the future